The American Academy of Pediatrics wades into
the organic food confusion with a paper out Monday to try to guide doctors in
their discussions with families about what to eat.
It turns
out, no surprise, to be an on-the-one-hand this, on-the-other-hand that
discussion, with the first point of advice to pediatricians being to encourage
patients and their families to eat a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, as
well as whole grains and low- or non-fat dairy products.
The paper
in the journal Pediatrics, a composite of studies on organically and
conventionally produced food, suggests that doctors review the academy’s report
with families to cover nutritional, health, environmental and cost implications
of their choices.
Drs. Joel
Forman and Janet Silverstein, along with the academy’s nutrition committee and
Council on Environmental Health, set out the arguments, noting that the organic
foods market has grown from $3.5 billion in 1996 to $28.6 billion in 2010,
according to the Organic Trade Assn.
Organic
diets, the authors say, expose consumers to fewer pesticides, and organic
farming has been shown to have less impact on the environment than conventional
operations. But, they say, there is no evidence of “meaningful nutritious
benefits” from an organic diet, and there are no good studies showing disease
protections from one.
The paper
notes that some studies have shown that families with children are more likely
to buy organic fruits and vegetables than other consumers – so the advice of
pediatricians could be particularly important.
No comments:
Post a Comment